Cancer Prevention


Fall 2003, Issue 2

Home

From the Editors

Calendar of Events
 
Breast and Ovarian Cancer Prevention in High-Risk Women

Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, MD
Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics
Professor, Department of Medicine
University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois

Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, MD
The cause of breast cancer remains unknown in the majority of patients but epidemiologic studies have identified numerous risk factors, some of which are modifiable. A family history of breast cancer is one of the strongest risk factors, particularly when the diagnosis was made in multiple first-degree relatives and at young ages. In addition, a history of bilateral breast cancer in a first-degree relative further increases the risk. About 5%--10% of breast cancer cases are due to inheritance of highly penetrant mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.

Women with a history of prior invasive breast cancer or a history of non-invasive breast lesions, such as atypical hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), carry an increased risk for invasive breast cancer. Moderate alcohol consumption and previous exposure to radiation, especially in survivors of childhood Hodgkin's disease, are also important risk factors. Early menarche and late menopause are weak risk factors. The effect of hormone replacement therapy or oral contraceptives on breast cancer risk has been controversial. However, prolonged use (> 5 years) of estrogen combined with progestins has been associated with increased breast cancer risk.

Considering the high prevalence of breast cancer, and the recent advances in chemoprevention or early detection of the disease, it is important to screen for the known risk factors so that women at high risk can be offered appropriate management options. Every woman with a family history of breast cancer requires a careful risk assessment and calculation of her lifetime risk of breast cancer.

Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 predict probabilities of breast cancer by age 70 of 45%--87% and 26%--84%, respectively, making these the strongest known predictors of breast cancer. The lifetime risks of ovarian cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are 16%--63% and 10%--27% respectively.(1--3) Genetic counseling and testing for breast cancer susceptibility genes, when appropriate, should be offered and provided as part of a comprehensive risk assessment plan.

Women who are found to be at high-risk for hereditary breast cancer may be interested in prophylactic surgery to reduce their risks. These women, including BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, can reduce their risk of breast cancer > 90% following prophylactic mastectomy. The results of the first prospective study of women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations showed that of 139 women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, 76 chose prophylactic bilateral mastectomy to reduce breast cancer risk; the remaining women chose a surveillance protocol consisting of a monthly breast self-examination (BSE), a semiannual breast examination by a healthcare professional, and annual mammography. Beginning in 1995, annual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was offered. With a follow up period of about 3 years, no breast cancers were observed in the 76 women who underwent bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, while eight cancers were detected in the surveillance group.(4) While prophylactic mastectomy is efficacious, it is only a minority of high-risk women who choose this option for risk reduction. Research into alternative methods for risk reduction are urgently needed.

The degree of risk reduction after prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for women with either strong family histories or germ-line BRCA mutation carriers has recently been demonstrated in two 2002 studies (Table 1).(5,6) Prophylactic oophorectomy appears to serve the dual purposes of eliminating the 'at risk' ovarian epithelium and decreasing breast cancer risk by reducing blood estradiol levels in premenopausal women. In a study that included 170 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers >- 35 years and who were offered the opportunity to enroll in a prospective follow-up study after receiving genetic test results, the 5-year cancer-free survival estimates for healthy BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers who had prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was 94% compared to 69% for mutation carriers who chose surveillance. The surgical complication rate appears to be minimal--only four of the 98 (4.1%) women had any surgical complications.(5)


Table 1. Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomy In BRCA Mutation Carriers

 
MSKCC Cohort (~ 2 yrs)(5)
PROSE Study (> 8 yrs)(6)
 
Ovarian Cancer %
Peritoneal Cancer %
Breast Cancer %
Ovarian Cancer %
Peritoneal Cancer %
Breast Cancer %
No BSO
5.5
1.4
12.9
19.9
0
42
BSO
3.1*
1.0
4.3
2.3*
0.8
21
BSO = bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
* Stage I ovarian cancers diagnosed at time of prophylactic surgery
A benefit of prophylactic oophorectomy has also been demonstrated in a multicenter, case-control study.(6) Among the 259 participants, six stage I ovarian cancers (2.3%) were diagnosed at the time of prophylactic surgery; two papillary serous peritoneal cancers were diagnosed at 3.8 and 8.6 years after prophylactic surgery. After a mean follow up of 8.8 years, with the exclusion of the six stage I ovarian cancers diagnosed at surgery, prophylactic oophorectomy significantly reduced the risk of epithelial ovarian and peritoneal cancers (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.01 to 0.16). Interestingly, there have been no events in the 124 women who had oophorectomy by age 35, suggesting that the timing of oophorectomy may be important. Likewise, for the 241 women who had no history of breast cancer and who had not undergone mastectomy, a 53% breast cancer risk reduction was observed (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.77). The most benefit in breast cancer risk reduction was observed in women who had prophylactic oophorectomy by age 50 years.

Other strategies for primary prevention, including the use of tamoxifen for breast cancer or the use of oral contraceptives and tubal ligation for ovarian cancer, have been proposed, although there are few data supporting the efficacy of the various interventions.(7--10) Secondary prevention options include early breast screening with advanced imaging techniques, such as MRI and ultrasound, or the use of transvaginal ultrasound and serial serum CA-125 or other ovarian cancer serum markers for ovarian cancer. (11,12)

References
  1. Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:676-689.
  2. Struewing JP, Hartge P, Wacholder S, et al. The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:401-1408.
  3. Thorlacius S, Struewing JP, Hartge P, et al. Population-based study of risk of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA2 mutation. Lancet. 1998;352:1337-1339.
  4. Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel B, van Putten WLJ, et al. Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:159-163.
  5. Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Scheuer L, et al. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2003;346:1609-1615.
  6. Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL, et al. Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA 1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1616-1622.
  7. Narod SA, Risch HA, Molehi, et al. Oral contraceptives and the risk of hereditary ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:424-428.
  8. Narod SA, Sun P, Ghadirian P, et al. Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: a case-control study. Lancet. 2001;357:1467-1470.
  9. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham L, et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:1371-1388.
  10. King MC, Wieand S, Hale K, et al. Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP-P1). Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. JAMA. 2001;286:2251-2256.
  11. Petricoin EF, Ardekani AM, Hitt BA, et al. Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2002;359:572-577.
  12. Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS, et al. Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography and ultrasound for surveillance of women at risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3524-3531.


 
Back to Top
 
New York-Presbyterian. The University Hospitals of Columbia and Cornell